New Africa France Summit : the Concealed Continuation of Emmanuel Macron's Africa Policy
A “New Africa-France Summit” was held on October, 8 at Arena Sud de France in Montpellier.
The continuation of the vision presented in Ouagadougou
The French president wanted this event to be “a radically new type” to “reshape the Africa-France relationship”. But this summit, which was supposed to be groundbreaking, was, however, part of the continuing communication around the changes in African policy in this five-year term. Entrepreneurship, civil society, diaspora, youth, new technologies, networking, promoting a “partnership relationship” and “opportunities” for economic cooperation were all key words at the heart of the discussions shaping this summit. On the other hand, there was little time for political issues, although some of them were broached on the civic engagement stage and during the plenary session.
With only seven months until the presidential election, this 28th summit marked a very clear break with the previous ones, both in terms of the invited audience and the format of the debates. Instead of a meeting between heads of state and governments, civil society was invited to Montpellier to talk directly to the French president, Emmanuel Macron.
The lack of political peers at this new format meeting caused astonishment and at times annoyance, particularly among Emmanuel Macron’s African counterparts. However, this feeling could be mitigated by the fact that the meeting took place only a few months after the Summit on Financing African Economies, held in Paris in May 2021, that brought together representatives of around 30 countries, including 20 African ones.
Is it a real breakthrough in relations between Africa and France or a means to reiterate a number of speeches and statements on African policy made by President Macron[i] since the Ouagadougou speech?[ii]
This editorial looks at the key moments of the event and examines the objectives and essential nature of the “summit”.
Welcome to the New Africa-France Summit
The morning session of the New Africa-France Summit gave the 3,000 attendees, who were featureless in their masks and headphones, the opportunity to walk around six themed areas and listen to the presentations. On each stage between 9:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., the speakers took very quick turns in giving short presentations of about five to ten minutes that did not allow time for debate.
The simultaneousness of the sessions and shortness of the presentations, not unlike the Paris Peace Forum or TED talks, combined with sport and musical entertainment, have undeniably revitalized and brought a burst of youthful energy sought by the French president. However, this modern agora almost inevitably revealed its downside, namely an increase in monologues without any opportunity for dialog, even more so in this moving and browsing audience, and a real lack of prioritization in the subjects discussed, as horizontality was the key factor. In the same way, the sheer variety of topics discussed, sometimes very briefly, made it difficult to build on the content of the hundreds of speeches made by civil society members from all parts of Africa and France.
The plenary session in the afternoon took a more traditional format with the French President Emmanuel Macron, Cameroonian historian Achille Mbembe, and 11 “rising stars” or representatives of African civil society and the diaspora. Mbembe had agreed to lead the discussion between the president and civil society[iii] and to write a report with specific recommendations on reshaping relations between Africa and France.[iv] Although his involvement was widely publicized and heavily criticized by some African intellectuals and activists[v] in the run-up to the event, he stayed out of the debate on the day of the summit.
The discussion between civil society representatives and President Macron was rehearsed in advance. The 11 speakers carried Afrooptimist
beliefs, “anti-Françafrique” criticism and direct messages, and they took turns presenting their demands to the French president. The president, who was assisted by Elisabeth Moreno, the Minister for Gender Equality, Diversity and Equal Opportunities, then replied. The exercise was based on television talk shows with very meticulous lighting and visuals.
The continuation of the vision presented in Ouagadougou
The French president wanted this event to be “a radically new type” to “reshape the Africa-France relationship”. But this summit, which was supposed to be groundbreaking, was, however, part of the continuing communication around the changes in African policy in this five-year term. Entrepreneurship, civil society, diaspora, youth, new technologies, networking, promoting a “partnership relationship” and “opportunities” for economic cooperation were all key words at the heart of the discussions shaping this summit. On the other hand, there was little time for political issues, although some of them were broached on the civic engagement stage and during the plenary session.
This condensing of topics has helped to avoid controversy and substantive debates on the many sticking points, that the president skilfully managed to bypass when he was questioned, such as French support for some authoritarian regimes, military interventions in the southern Sahara, or the continued presence of French military bases.[vi]
In contrast, Emmanuel Macron seized the opportunity of this publicized and livestreamed dialog to reiterate some key aspects of his African policy. He also emphasized a renewed relationship between Africa and France, and a break with the previous “Françafrique” policy. This is demonstrated by his desire to move away from paternalism, although he refused to make a formal apology for French colonization in Africa. Likewise, artworks looted during colonization will be returned, as the president had already stated in November 2017 in Ouagadougou. In terms of political and economic cooperation, the president promised changes that were, however, restricted to a superficial reframing: so, people will no longer speak about “development assistance”, but rather of “solidarity investment”. Similarly, the French Development Agency, a key actor of the French development policy, will be renamed, as suggested by La République en Marche deputy, Hervé Berville, in his “Modernization of the Partnership-Based Development Policy[vii]" report in September 2018. The establishment of a Democracy Support Fund provided with € 30 million over three years, as well as the foundation of a “House of African Worlds and Diasporas” in Paris were also announced, which are the first two recommendations in Achille Mbembe’s report, and bodes well for other decisions.
A diplomatic tool in support of "Macron's" style of politics
In keeping with his wish to break with traditional methods, President Emmanuel Macron wanted to hold the 2021 meeting in Montpellier under the banner of transparency, horizontality, and renewed relations between his country and Africa. Some heads of state have also questioned the very description of this meeting as a real “summit”.[viii] In this case, we can legitimately ask what is a diplomatic summit?
Some answers actually emerge when we consider who Emmanuel Macron was addressing. According to him, the people of Africa, its civil society and its youth. However, the sidelining of his African counterparts at this meeting already contains a message for them, against a tense diplomatic background with Mali and Algeria: would it be possible to do without the African leaders and work with civil society?
A key theme of the October 8 speech, the “diasporas” are specifically targeted and called upon to be the cornerstone in the relationship between Africa and France. The use of quotation marks is warranted by the broad definition and the approximate figure given by Emmanuel Macron: “seven million French citizens whose lives are linked to Africa”. Like all his predecessors since Mitterand have asserted, Emmanuel Macron wants to get rid of “Françafrique” and speak directly to Africa in France.[ix] Finally, in a context of geopolitical reconfiguration in Africa, it is debatable whether the French head of state has not indirectly adopted a stance in relation to his Chinese, Russian and Turkish counterparts, by emphasizing the competitive advantage conferred upon France by its “share of Africanness".[x] Indeed, in recent years, these three countries have managed to use the summit process as a diplomatic tool for influence and power projection.
Despite the talk around the groundbreaking aspects of this New Summit, it is necessary to place it in a broader political and diplomatic context, specifically characterized by the Summit on Financing African Economies in May 2021. Will Emmanuel Macron continue this policy of dual summits? From January 2022, France will hold the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union when the Africa-Europe Summit, which has been postponed for two years due to the Covid-19 pandemic, will be held. This approach highlights the president’s commitment to place France’s African policy within a European and multilateral approach, and indicates that he has not completely broken with the diplomatic process.[xi]
[i]. F. Gaulme, “Emmanuel Macron et l’Afrique. La vision et l’héritage”, Etudes de l’Ifri, Ifri, January 2019.
[ii]. “Le discours de Ouagadougou d’Emmanuel Macron”, Le Monde, November 29, 2017, www.lemonde.fr
[iii]. Achille Mbembe conducted sixty interviews with more than 4,000 people in 12 African countries to identify civil society demands and prepare the report.
[iv]. A. Mbembe, “Les nouvelles relations Afrique-France: Relever ensemble les défis de demain”, October 2021,http://www.elysee.fr
[vii]. H. Berville, “Modernisation de la politique partenariale de développement”, August 2018, www.gouvernement.fr
[x]. “Emmanuel Macron veut que la France assume sa part d’africanité”, Les Echos, October 9, 2021.
[xi]. The authors would particularly like to thank Ysé Auque-Pallez for her help in arranging their attendance at the summit.
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
New Africa France Summit : the Concealed Continuation of Emmanuel Macron's Africa Policy
Author(s)
Elisa DOMINGUES DOS SANTOS
Associate Research Fellow, Sub-Saharan Africa Center and Turkey/Middle East Program, Ifri
Sina SCHLIMMER
Research Fellow at Ifri's Sub-Saharan Africa Center, Head of the Governing the Urban Transition in Africa research program
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programs
Sub-Saharan Africa Center
Founded in 2007, Ifri's Sub-Saharan Africa center produces an in-depth analysis of the African continent and its security, geopolitical, political and socio-economic dynamics (in particular the phenomenon of urbanization). The Center aims to be both, through various publications and conferences, a space for disseminating analyzes intended for the media and the public but also a decision-making tool for political and economic actors with regard to the continent.
The center produces analyses for various organizations such as the Ministry of the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the French Development Agency (AFD) and even for various private supports. Its researchers are regularly interviewed by parliamentary committees.
The organization of events of various formats complements the production of analyzes by bringing the different spheres of the public space (academic, political, media, economic and civil society) to meet and exchange analytical tools and visions of the continent. The Sub-Saharan Africa Center regularly welcomes political leaders from different sub-Saharan African countries.
Find out more
Discover all our analyses
The High Authority for Peacebuilding (HACP) in Niger 2011-2023. Placing the State at the heart of conflict prevention and management.
Like other Sahelian countries, Niger has been affected by terrorism for almost two decades now. This issue has highlighted both the limits of these countries’ security systems and, more profoundly, their inability to offer stability to the populations of certain parts of the country. In a way, these “jihadized insurgencies” are a continuity of groups that regularly take up arms against central states.
Kenya’s Spiritual President and The Making of a Born-Again Republic: William-Ruto, Kenya’s Evangelicals and Religious Mobilizations in African Electoral Politics
Over the last two decade, the growing influence of Evangelicals and their leaders in electoral politics is one of the most significant developments in the East African region and the Horn of Africa. Their numerical and demographic growth seems to go together with their growing influence in these countries’ political scenes, especially in the spheres of electoral politics, society, and governance.
Chad: from Deby to Deby. Recipes for a successful succession (2021-2024)
As in Togo and Gabon, the transition that took place in Chad from 2021 to
2024 resulted in a dynastic succession. Mahamat Idriss Deby succeeded his
father, Idriss Deby Itno, who was President of Chad from 1996 to 2021. While
the majority of Chadians were hoping for a change of government, the “Deby
system” has managed to hold on.
The Influence of Strategic Subnational Diplomacy in International Relations
The international engagement of cities and local governments has increased and diversified recently. Mainly understood by the public as the cultural and academic ties cultivated within the sister-city framework, these connections now bear deeper and more strategic implications.