Innovation: a New Mode of Climate Action
A range of announcements of energy and climate coalitions have been made during COP21. Beyond their important diplomatic objectives, these new forms of coalitions bring scientists and industry leaders towards new long term visions of energy consumption modes.
In the course of COP21, French and Indian governments have jointly announced an “International Solar coalition” gathering 100 countries in promoting research and development efforts in the solar industry. This follows from a range of announcements of energy and climate coalitions, timely scheduled during COP21. Beyond their important diplomatic objectives, these new forms of coalitions bring scientists and industry leaders towards new long term visions of energy consumption modes. They set the ground for elements of framework of the post COP21- climate action agenda[1] around one common denominator: innovation.
Energy and climate coalitions gather multiple actors (stakeholders) organized in networks of representatives from governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, different industries or international agencies. They are either industry led, like the “Oil and Gas Climate Initiative” (OGCI) or the Cement Sustainable Initiative (CSI). They can also be organized around achieving a common goal: for instance, RE100 Initiative of the Climate Group, gathering companies from different sectors of the economy, is targeting clean consumption sourcing modes and offsets of greenhouse gases emissions.
All of them are the outcome of “bottom-up” initiatives, which have been gathering pace at corporate and/or governmental level, with sometimes strong regional footholds, like Abu Dhabi’s Masdar Institute or California’s Strategy in Storage Technology. If these initiatives are too limited to have a meaningful impact on global warming, they have a strong impact effect on public policy. Based on a self-empowerment or self-regulation mode of climate action, they offer attractive approaches alternatives to complement the market-based approach of managing environmental externalities, for instance through the internalisation of a carbon price. They also influence the elaboration of new codes of conducts for large industries operating at global level.
As a result, they are also opening the way towards a more balanced mode of resources exploitation, where constraints on resources are analysed at a system/regional level, for instance by considering hydrocarbon schemes together with water scarcity. Finally, they act as a powerful leverage of cross industry collaboration, all based on innovation. In particular, in the renewable - smart grid industry, a strong entrepreneurship mind-set, developed around Google and Facebook in the Breakthrough Energy Coalition[2], will continue moving the energy sector in the next decade.
European Policy on Research, Innovation and Competitiveness, constituting the fifth pillar of the Energy Union project, rightly acknowledges the need to bridge the gap between knowledge and industrialisation[3]. This is a critical moment to foster a “European based knowledge” on smart grids and clean energy. Consolidating a European intellectual property base, while evaluating potential market applications and preparing the ground for future norms to smart grid technologies, is also part of the dynamics of the Energy Union announced in February 2015. In this perspective, innovation will act as a catalyst for climate action and energy transition.
[1] Insight_E, “Shaping Expectations to Foster the Low Carbon Transition: Can COP21 be a catalyst for action?”, Carole Mathieu, Ifri
[2] http://www.breakthroughenergycoalition.com/en/index.html
[3] “The Knowledge Future: Intelligent policy choices for Europe 2050”: A Report to the European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/research//pdf/publications/knowledge_future_2050.pdf
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesCan carbon markets make a breakthrough at COP29?
Voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) have a strong potential, notably to help bridge the climate finance gap, especially for Africa.
Taiwan's Energy Supply: The Achilles Heel of National Security
Making Taiwan a “dead island” through “a blockade” and “disruption of energy supplies” leading to an “economic collapse.” This is how Colonel Zhang Chi of the People’s Liberation Army and professor at the National Defense University in Beijing described the objective of the Chinese military exercises in May 2024, following the inauguration of Taiwan’s new president, Lai Ching-te. Similar to the exercises that took place after Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei in August 2022, China designated exercise zones facing Taiwan’s main ports, effectively simulating a military embargo on Taiwan. These maneuvers illustrate Beijing’s growing pressure on the island, which it aims to conquer, and push Taiwan to question its resilience capacity.
India’s Broken Power Economics : Addressing DISCOM Challenges
India’s electricity demand is rising at an impressive annual rate of 9%. From 2014 to 2023, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) surged from 1.95 trillion dollars ($) to $3.2 trillion (constant 2015 US$), and the nation is poised to maintain this upward trajectory, with projected growth rates exceeding 7% in 2024 and 2025. Correspondingly, peak power demand has soared from 136 gigawatts (GW) in 2014 to 243 GW in 2024, positioning India as the world’s third-largest energy consumer. In the past decade, the country has increased its power generation capacity by a remarkable 190 GW, pushing its total installed capacity beyond 400 GW.
The Troubled Reorganization of Critical Raw Materials Value Chains: An Assessment of European De-risking Policies
With the demand for critical raw materials set to, at a minimum, double by 2030 in the context of the current energy transition policies, the concentration of critical raw materials (CRM) supplies and, even more, of refining capacities in a handful of countries has become one of the paramount issues in international, bilateral and national discussions. China’s dominant position and successive export controls on critical raw materials (lately, germanium, gallium, rare earths processing technology, graphite, antimony) point to a trend of weaponizing critical dependencies.