Practical information
Themes and regions
Related centers and programs
Registration for this event is now closed.
Find out more about our donor programsThe National Security Law that entered into force in Hong Kong on 30 June is a game changer for the city. How are Hong Kong's authorities adjusting? How might this impact Hong Kong's role as a bridge to China and a major international financial center?
A closed-door, virtual discussion with
Matthew Cheung, GBM, GBS, JP
Chief Secretary for Administration of the Hong Kong SAR Government,
With analysis from
- Alicia Garcia-Herrero, Chief Economisnt for Asia-Pacific, Natixis, and Senior Fellow, Bruegel
- Marc Julienne, Head of China research, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
Chaired by
Françoise Nicolas, Director, Center for Asian Studies, Ifri
Find out more
Hong Kong : The 2019 Protest Movement and the Future of Autonomy
The current protest movement in Hong Kong, which began with the proposed extradition law in June 2019 that would have considerably weakened the judicial border between Hong Kong and Mainland China, has set itself apart from the city’s numerous movements in recent years by its massive following. The protestors, who employ original strategies (online organization, absence of clear leadership, use of digital tools), achieved an initial success with the suspension of the proposed law in September. But even after the law’s withdrawal, massive protests and increasing acts of violence continued to grip the territory. Demands now center around an independent investigation into acts of police violence and on the revival of democratic reforms.
Related Subjects
Other events
Navigating War, Reforms, and Secure Future: Ukraine’s EU and NATO Accession Path
Exclusive conve
Lunch debate with Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of New Zealand
Discussion co-chaired by Thierry de Montbrial, Executive Chairman of Ifri, member of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences, and Marc Hecker, Deputy Director of Ifri (in English without translation).
Shaping Europe’s Technological Sovereignty
In the wake of Donald Trump's re-election in the United States, Europeans face a crucial imperative: rethinking their sovereigny, especially in the technological realm. What will be the strategic priorities and action levers of the new European Commission on this issue? What assessment can we make of the previous Commission’s achievements and challenges in navigating Sino-American technological competition, transatlantic dependencies, and emerging global partnerships?