Neither Surveillance nor Algorithm-driven Consumerism. Toward an Alternative European Model for Smart Cities
Numerous smart city projects are emerging, guided by objectives of efficiency and improvement of public policies. All of them are based on intensive use of data and digital tools, but their concrete achievements take various forms. Some models are being exported and are becoming levers of influence, while Europe is still looking for its own path.
Smart city projects take many forms, ranging from the installation of connected street lights to total initiatives such as The Line - the gargantuan and futuristic project led by Saudi Arabia. In one form or another, these initiatives are multiplying, notably guided by objectives of efficiency and improvement of public policies. What they all have in common is that they mobilize numerous digital tools and make use of data to develop and manage public services. Where does Europe stand on this spectrum and how are the models used as levers of influence?
Two models are unanimously rejected: the one promoted by China and the one implemented by some North American cities. The first subordinates the smart city to security and social control imperatives. It contributes to a constant surveillance of the population. In contrast to this model, which is primarily designed to achieve control and surveillance objectives on behalf of the State, the Californian-inspired North American model is criticized for its massive use of personal data, which is collected and used by private actors. Residents are alarmed by the potential use of these data for commercial purposes and deplore the replacement of democratic deliberations by automated tools.
Therefore, developing a European model requires taking into account these pitfalls and respecting both the challenges related to the protection of privacy and the maintenance of open and democratic procedures. Europe can rely on an ambitious regulatory framework, capable of encouraging the development of smart cities. This framework can also be a real asset for exporting its model to other continents. European initiatives in the field of smart cities are also part of efforts to promote digital sovereignty. In this respect, matters of standardization, interoperability and infrastructure are at the heart of the debate, and while they must be fully integrated into the projects implemented, they are also the subject of fierce international competition.
This publication is also available in French: Ni surveillance, ni consumérisme algorithmique. Vers un modèle européen alternatif pour les villes intelligentes
Available in:
Regions and themes
Share
Download the full analysis
This page contains only a summary of our work. If you would like to have access to all the information from our research on the subject, you can download the full version in PDF format.
Neither Surveillance nor Algorithm-driven Consumerism. Toward an Alternative European Model for Smart Cities
Related centers and programs
Discover our other research centers and programsFind out more
Discover all our analysesChina’s Mature Node Overcapacity: Unfounded Fears
China is decoupling from, not flooding, the global mature-node semiconductor market. As China increasingly pursues industrial policies encouraging domestic chip production, its own growing chip demand will prevent a direct flood of cheap Chinese chips on foreign shores. However, as Beijing achieves its goal of decreasing the reliance of domestic downstream manufacturers on foreign chips, European and American mature-node semiconductor companies will feel the ripple effects of an increasingly “involuted” Chinese chip ecosystem.
Sat-to-Cell: Towards Universal Connectivity?
Sat-to-Cell is a new type of service that connects smartphones directly to satellites. It has recently enabled innovative applications such as emergency text messaging via satellite. The technology is developing rapidly, and many questions are now being raised about its potential impact.
From Ukraine to Gaza: Military Uses of Artificial Intelligence
The wars in Ukraine and Gaza show us the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI) has become integral to battlefield operations.
Artificial Intelligence, or The Race for Power
Artificial intelligence (AI) is here to stay, and its use is spreading at a rate that is difficult to comprehend.